Skip to main content

Hi everyone.

I had an interesting scenario occur at a scored race a few weeks ago. Halfway through the 2nd run, I lost the primary start gate connection, but still had the backup connection. It turns out that a banana plug had pulled out. So, we simply posted the backup time to the scoreboard (with a notation), and then updated it with an EET after the run.

Now the interesting part - when doing the EET, I noticed that starting with the six racers prior to the missed start time, the difference between Sys A and B times increased from 0.06s to 0.13s immediately prior to the miss. Furthermore, the difference occurred almost entirely at the start. Before and after that, the differences were usually less than 0.01s. Clearly, the plug loosened six racers prior to the miss and affected those times. What should I have done?

What I did is simply perform an EET on the missed time and nothing more.

What I believe that I should have done is to also perform EETs on the prior six racers. As Chief of Timing, it was clear to me that the primary system had malfunctioned, and I believe that it was well within my purview to make the change.

What do others think?
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Hmmmmm.....
I think that this specific situation shall be considered covered by ICR 611.3.2.

If the Chief of Timing thinks that System A failed, and in this case you also have some evidence, there is no reason to use it. System B times shall be used.

ICR is quite clear for this situation.
What you did is quite weird, if I correctly understood: for a bunch of skiers you kept the times coming from System A, which was failing, and you have some evidence.

Since there is no way (as far as I can understand reading what you wrote) to state who was actually affected by the failure, ALL skiers shall be judged with Sys B. This is just my opinion, people with better skills and experience might help more.
Yeah, we didn't handled this correctly. We should have done EETs on all six of the racers prior to the missed time as well.

As I described above, it's clear that the plug loosened six racers prior to the miss, so there's no reason to move completely to Sys B.

The good news is that the affected racers were all ranked in the 60's, so the impact on their points is negligible.

As an aside, moving to Sys B would have been a big deal -- USST member Ryan Cochran-Siegle won the race by beating his cousin Robby Kelley by just 0.01s, but they were tied on the backup. I'd hate to get in the middle of that family competition!

Anyway, live and learn. We'll get it right next time.

-- Mark

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×