Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Member
Picture of Admin
Posted
Fred is there a USSA hight to set the wand at? I know the gates must be 60 X 60, but how about the height of the wand on the gate? And the height of the finish beams off the snow? Thanks


Originally posted 13 Nov 2001 by Chase chase@vara.org
 
Posts: 424 | Location: Montreal, Canada | Registered: August 29, 2002Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Admin
Posted Hide Post
From the latest USSA Competition Update - 2001-2002

Start Gate Specifications: The posts supporting the start gate should not project more than approximately 60 cm above the snow and should be approximately 60
cm apart. (2.2.1.2.2)

This is on page 6 of the Teaching Review update which is available on the USSA web site


Originally posted 14 Nov 2001 by Dirk Gouwens dirk@dreamscape.com
 
Posts: 424 | Location: Montreal, Canada | Registered: August 29, 2002Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Admin
Posted Hide Post
I set up the start wand personally at about two dozen World Cup races in the years 1995-99. Ted Savage, who as part of the FIS Timing Working Group writes a lot of the timing rules, was technical director for TAG Heuer at the time and instructed me to set the wand so that it hits the average racer just below mid-shin, a few inches above the top of the boot tongue.

I'm 6'2" and the top of my boot tongue is 14.5" off the snow, so that puts the wand at about 16"-17" off the snow. That is right in the middle of the ALGE guidelines. I usually lowered the wand an inch for the chicks on sticks.

The objective is consistency. Bad placement isn't going to cause you to miss starts completely, but Ted has proven quantitatively that even the best start wands have a lot of "mechanical slop" in them, so the outcome of a close race can be affected by a wand that is set too high (hitting the cmnpetitors across the knees) or too low
(hitting the boot cuff).

Start wands are relics from another era and hopefully will be replaced at some point by photocells, in the interest of fairness and accuracy.

Originally posted 14 Nov 2001 by James Broder
 
Posts: 424 | Location: Montreal, Canada | Registered: August 29, 2002Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 


© 2000-2007 Phoenix Sports Technology. Administration by www.alphasports.tv